![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
You know, sometimes I think that people are sane, and then I read about something like this.
CDD - Christian Domestic Discipline.
[[Sorry, insert moment of further WTF - watching Smallville after having not seen it for several years, WHAT, Lex is in love with Lana? WHAT, Lionel is DEAD? SAY IT AIN'T SO.]]
Anyway. Back to the Domestic Discipline (I'm leaving the Christian out of it for the rest of it because the people I consider "real" Christians are not crazies, kthnx, and while religion figures into this, weird-ass gender issues are more what I'm going WTF-ing about).
A few quotes from the Frequently Asked Questions by Men page.
"Why does my wife want to be spanked?
Because she needs to feel that you are in charge and because she has been acting in less than a way a proper wife should.
Do I have to spank her to tears?
Yes, by spanking her to tears you are allowing her to fully submit and be humbled for her actions.
What if I am mad, could I hurt her?
If angry at the time, put her in the corner and take that time to cool down, once you have gotten control of your anger then spank her.
Can't I just listen to her instead ?
No, she has all the girlfriends she need to listen to her, she needs you to be strong and correct her behavior.
*mouth hangs open as she continues to read through the website*
I don't want to believe this is actually real, but it can't all be some kind of parody. If only. Holy crap, this is some scary shit.
For added rage, also see Why My Daughter is Not a Girl Scout, because Girl Scouts support such horrors as short hair, feminism, Planned Parenthood, and *gasp* lesbianism. It also suggests that telling your daughter that she's just as valuable as a boy is comparable to putting her in the KKK.
My eyes! Instead, I must flood my mind with thoughts of the Queen Elizabeth movie that's coming out tomorrow. The two seconds of Geoffrey Rush in the commercials is enough evidence of a man's submission to a woman to make these CDD people's brains fizzle.
Also, Cate Blanchett in plate mail. Also, Geoffrey Rush. *swoon* I should watch the first one again.
CDD - Christian Domestic Discipline.
[[Sorry, insert moment of further WTF - watching Smallville after having not seen it for several years, WHAT, Lex is in love with Lana? WHAT, Lionel is DEAD? SAY IT AIN'T SO.]]
Anyway. Back to the Domestic Discipline (I'm leaving the Christian out of it for the rest of it because the people I consider "real" Christians are not crazies, kthnx, and while religion figures into this, weird-ass gender issues are more what I'm going WTF-ing about).
A few quotes from the Frequently Asked Questions by Men page.
"Why does my wife want to be spanked?
Because she needs to feel that you are in charge and because she has been acting in less than a way a proper wife should.
Do I have to spank her to tears?
Yes, by spanking her to tears you are allowing her to fully submit and be humbled for her actions.
What if I am mad, could I hurt her?
If angry at the time, put her in the corner and take that time to cool down, once you have gotten control of your anger then spank her.
Can't I just listen to her instead ?
No, she has all the girlfriends she need to listen to her, she needs you to be strong and correct her behavior.
*mouth hangs open as she continues to read through the website*
I don't want to believe this is actually real, but it can't all be some kind of parody. If only. Holy crap, this is some scary shit.
For added rage, also see Why My Daughter is Not a Girl Scout, because Girl Scouts support such horrors as short hair, feminism, Planned Parenthood, and *gasp* lesbianism. It also suggests that telling your daughter that she's just as valuable as a boy is comparable to putting her in the KKK.
My eyes! Instead, I must flood my mind with thoughts of the Queen Elizabeth movie that's coming out tomorrow. The two seconds of Geoffrey Rush in the commercials is enough evidence of a man's submission to a woman to make these CDD people's brains fizzle.
Also, Cate Blanchett in plate mail. Also, Geoffrey Rush. *swoon* I should watch the first one again.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 01:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 01:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 01:24 am (UTC)"this overwhelming coldness and oppression I recognized at once as originating from Satan. ... As a mother who’d helped her daughter sell Girl Scout cookies for several years, I was crushed. Had my efforts been going toward killing babies?" When/if (but most likely when) Julie is a girl scout THAT will be our selling pitch: "Buy a cookie, kill a baby!!!"
"encouraging field trips to Planned Parenthood." Because all lesbians need abortions (which seems to be her only gripe about PP... I know it is other things. Just re-harping the idiocy.)
"my husband absolutely forbade it" The day Joe "forbids" something is the day I either divorce him or go to jail for assault.
Gee, now we know why you and Caitirin are married. She was a girl scout? o.O WTF? That website made my head hurt (and I've seen the "discipline" website before)
no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 01:31 am (UTC)XD!!
The day Joe "forbids" something is the day I either divorce him or go to jail for assault.
XD!!!!!!!
Yes, surely Caitirin's 13-year career as a Girl Scout turned her into a lesbo! Weirdly, it only took me 3 years.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 01:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 10:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 01:41 am (UTC)That's it. No more Internets for you! o.O
no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 11:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 02:36 am (UTC)I've got nothing against spanking if two adult partners mutually consent to it, but to present it in such a misogynistic fashion, as the right of the husband as lord and master and the duty of the wife is just sickening.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 10:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 10:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 10:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 10:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 10:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 03:38 am (UTC)But did you see the faux mediaeval chivalric programmes for boys and girls on that website? I dunno what it is about all that sort of thing, but it makes me a mite uneasy. And what it it with fundamentalists and sex, they're obsessed with it? I'm sure I don't think about doin' the nasty half as much as they do.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 10:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 06:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 11:06 am (UTC)The Christians I personally know over here are wonderful, completely rational people :)
no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 11:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 11:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 12:14 pm (UTC)And those people aren't reading the bible, they're reading select lines and ignoring the rest, which doesn't count.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 11:06 am (UTC)I'll take four.
If Girl Scouts makes you lesbian, then what about Boy Scouts? Should I be going after Rich and Paul now?
Or does all scouting make you somewhat more masculine in gender? Should I be a shining beacon of testosterone?
no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 11:07 am (UTC)Yes, definitely XD
Or does all scouting make you somewhat more masculine in gender?
I think that may have been the idea, but I like the "turns you gay" reason better!
no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 10:21 pm (UTC)=D
Welcome to Christian Domestic Discipline??!
Date: 2007-10-12 11:22 am (UTC)And about the Girl Scouts -- that poor organization just can't please anybody, it seems. Others accuse them of being too Christian. It just proves that when you get too extreme in your idealogy, you essentially become a cult member and nobody can possibly be pure enough for you.
I was in the Girl Scouts. Can I blame them for my kinks? ^_^ The ones that aren't faith practices, that is? :D
Re: Welcome to Christian Domestic Discipline??!
Date: 2007-10-12 10:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 11:27 am (UTC)Now ... if they start opening clubs for this sort of thing ...
no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 10:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 10:02 pm (UTC)The Icon Speaks:
Date: 2007-10-12 11:28 am (UTC)Re: The Icon Speaks:
Date: 2007-10-12 10:09 pm (UTC)Re: The Icon Speaks:
Date: 2007-10-13 01:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 11:29 am (UTC)Re: Jesus was a Feminist~
Date: 2007-10-12 10:05 pm (UTC)It is laughable, and scary at the same time. I have no idea where they are O.o It didn't occur to me that they were in America until
I don't personally know any crackpot Christians. I think it's just that Christianity is a majority in America, and so there's more chance for there to be crazies among them, as there are with any group anywhere.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 01:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 10:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-14 07:55 pm (UTC)Srsly...
Date: 2007-10-12 02:22 pm (UTC)There are way too many WTF quotes on that website. I spent the last ten or so minutes reading through the various articles! I was laughing the entire time... until I realised that it was probably meant to be taken seriously. Just... wow.
One of the articles I found amusing/scary talked about how "christian" women should wear dresses, and the woman who wrote it mentioned feeling more "christ-like" in a dress/skirt. And, I can't help but picture Jesus in drag... O_O Then she talks about how she goes commando or wears... dare I say, crotchless pantaloons... to be more "available" to her husband...
I also like the disclaimer on the front page... Though we recognize by its very nature this subject can be erotic, we will keep this website as clean and wholesome as possible. However, we will not seek to deny the erotic nature of some CDD marriages as we believe it is a natural consequence of following God's plan. After all, He created eroticism to be enjoyed inside a Christian marriage.
Which... makes me think that they're neither denying or confirming the "christian" value of BDSM. Now I'm thinking of Jesus in drag with a ballgag and whip...
If I wasn't before, I'm surely now going to hell if there is one. Q_Q
Re: Srsly...
Date: 2007-10-12 10:55 pm (UTC)XD Well, we DO always see him pictured not wearing pants.
Then she talks about how she goes commando or wears... dare I say, crotchless pantaloons... to be more "available" to her husband...
And THAT is a scary, scary notion.
Which... makes me think that they're neither denying or confirming the "christian" value of BDSM. Now I'm thinking of Jesus in drag with a ballgag and whip...
Oh man. *scrubs brain* I think they ARE just trying to cover up for being into BDSM, though.
Re: Srsly...
Date: 2007-10-12 11:10 pm (UTC)Crazies simultaneously amuse and scare me.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 06:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 10:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-13 08:27 pm (UTC)Sheesh. You know what dude? If you and your wife are into spanking, more power to you as long as it's consensual. Just don't pretend that Jeebus told you to do it - I don't think he had much to say on the matter, pro or con.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-13 11:38 pm (UTC)