Stupid pronoun agreement

[elaby]

I have decided that it would be much easier on everyone if the English language went back to using "his" as a non-gender-specific pronoun. Because, as I've recently learned (to my annoyance), it is ungrammatical to say something like "An American should show their passport to the customs officer". You have to say "An American should show his or her passport to the customs officer". And that sounds idiotic in most situations when you're trying to write smoothly. So I propose that in the case that gender isn't specified, it become acceptable to say "his". It used to be that "his" was the gender-neutral pronoun, but now it's just for boys, and people throw a FIT if you don't include both genders. Bah, I say.

... Yes, I'll go back to writing my paper now.

Comments

[coastal-spirit.livejournal.com]

Sometimes they took turns. They used the genderless term "God" rather than "Lord" or "Father" whenever possible, but sometimes used "Mother", or "she" in readings regarding "God". An Episcopal prayer also actually starts "Mother/Father God ...".

I'm old enough to remember when women truly, seriously faced discrimination in the workplace and just in general life, so I understand and sympathize with where this language change is coming from, even if it does make me roll my eyes a lot of the time.

[elaby.livejournal.com]

Weirdly enough, we talked about this issue in Grammar class today, and apparently it's unarguable now. You just CAN'T use "he", "him", or "his" to refer to a non-gender-specific word like "anyone" or "whoever". I guess since it never would have occurred to me to be offended by this, so that's why it annoys me... but I can see where they were coming from in the change. And this is the ONLY thing my incredibly conservative professor actually advocates, which he said in class today: "Don't expect to ever hear me praising progressive things again". I hope he was kidding just a little, but I don't know ^^;;