Money, money, money

[elaby]

Victorian currency (shillings, crowns, guineas, etc) appeals to me immensely. I'm not sure why; the decimal system seems much easier to remember. There's just something about the pre-decimalization terms that sound lyrical to me. Anyway, because I'm a geek and the idea fascinates me that in the 1860's you could buy an umbrella for twice what a milk-woman made in a week, I wanted to figure out how much Watson's pension is at the beginning of A Study in Scarlet.

I've done some math here; beware.

Watson's pension in 1881 is 11s 6d* a day, which comes out to 3£ 17s weekly. In around 1860, his weekly income would buy a frock coat, or a water-closet (without the installation fees, I can only assume). The disparity between these in comparison to today boggles me.

So, if I did the math right, that means Watson makes 209£ 14s 8d a year. Not bad, but not great; that's within the second lowest middle-class bracket (the middle bracket, in fact - between "under £100" and "£300-1,000") in the 1861 census, exactly 20 years earlier. There were tons of middle class people making less than 100£ a year, but all working class people were classified as making less than 100£ a year as well. This would mean that Watson was making, every year, a bit more than twice as much as a junior clerk second class in the Post Office would make, and if I recall correctly, about as much as a Scotland Yard detective could be expected to make. Not bad, for a pension. And since he was a doctor, it would put him solidly in the middle class, even though you could be a skilled worker (or a policeman) and be making more than that while still be considered working class. Not that we ever doubted Watson was middle-class.


*For those on my f'list not familiar with the abbreviations, s=shilling and d=pence. I was completely flummoxed by this in the Moomintroll books when I was little, no less by the 8/- meaning eight shillings and no pence. I thought they'd made up the currency *laughs*

Comments

[missprinty.livejournal.com]

I think you're still working class but your children would be more likely to be middle class. Or at least, that's how I always thought it worked. Possibly the working class might sneer at you with your fancy ways and degree, the middle class might accept you as an honorary member as your children find themselves enjoying a more middle class lifestyle than you did. It seems to be much simpler in America where it's all about the money, and nobody cares who your father was, you make your own destiny. Personally I tend towards the British view that you are a product of your upbringing, and there is nothing you can do to change it.

And then there the whole aristocracy versus meritocracy. Just because you're smart and work hard and succeed doesn't make you posh, and goodness knows there are some monumentally stupid people in the upper classes.

[the-arethusa.livejournal.com]

And then there the whole aristocracy versus meritocracy

Not forgetting that the grammar school system proved that we can't even do meritocracy without bringing our elitist class concerns into it.

I could go further with this but I will spare elaby's comments page ;)

[missprinty.livejournal.com]

Well quite!

And sorry elaby, we've been comment spamming like mad.

[elaby.livejournal.com]

It's no problem :) It's all very interesting!

[elaby.livejournal.com]

I don't mind conversation in my comments! You guys can go as far as you want :) Or stop whenever you want.